Hence, it requires the development of a predictive ion source model based on ANNs and further optimized using NIEA. This maiden study examines the efficacy of nature-inspired evolutionary algorithms (NIEAs) for optimizing the input parameters of an ion source model based on an artificial neural network (ANN) that generates high-density negative hydrogen ions. However, operating the ion sources with repeatable performance remains challenging and time-consuming due to its nonlinear nature and the complex relation between the input and output parameters. Michael D.The plasma sources are a device that produces energetic ion streams for applications in diversified fields.Steve Ratts on Comparison of HDR Tools HDR Merge, Lightroom, Photomatix and SNS-HDR.Peter Marbaise on Comparison of HDR Tools HDR Merge, Lightroom, Photomatix and SNS-HDR.LG Ultrafine 32UN880B best small budget 4K monitor.Testing out software under Windows 10 with virtual machines.Otherwise you could order Luminar NEO with a discount of 10,– € and the code TUXOCHE. Skylum just needs to improve the times considerably and also reduce the cropping on the images when bicolor alignment is needed.

The results delivered by the focus stacking extension are fine. Helikon Focus also does a better job here. If the image is assembled without alignment of the different partial images, the size is correct, but the result is not usable. Sometimes there were differences of 200-400px on the longer edge, When creating the comparison images, I noticed that the Luminar result was always smaller in its dimensions than the image created by Helicon Focus.

In my opinion, this can no longer be explained by Beta. The mushroom image above, consisting of 22 individual shots takes 22 seconds in Helikon Focus, while in Luminar NEO you need more than 2 minutes. The focus stacking extension is incredibly slow. The downerĮven though it is a beta version with the Luminar extension. The difference is practically indistinguishable and if you don’t value the additional possibilities Helicon Focus offers, but simply the result as it can be achieved with standard settings, then both are equal. The finished can be saved as Tiff or DNG and also already shared on different platforms. It’s not critical now, but you have more intervention options with Helikon Fokus. Here, however, you can see the process of how Helicon Focus assembles the different focus layers. These can be either Tiff files or RAW files. With Helicon Focus the single images are also loaded into the program. There should be an option to choose the location or at least to store it in the original folder. However, this album is also stored in the user’s profile in the C: drive, just like HDR Merge. Of course you can then process them further, either with Luminar NEO or any other program. The images are then listed as shown here and then the individual images are added together.Īs with the HDR extension, the finished images are collected in an automatically created album and saved as a Tiff file. You can only align the single shots, which is recommended, and also remove the chromatic aberration. The extension doesn’t offer much in the way of settings. There is of course also with other objects, flowers or jewelry are there grateful motifs. To try it out, I took mushroom pictures of course adapted to the season, where I took several pictures with different photos with an app.

Helicon remote reviews